|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
> "Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> wrote in message
> news:web.49aa69caf3f1ac26f50167bc0@news.povray.org...
> > "clipka" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> >
> >> "The day the earth caught fire" was another example of misconceptions
> >> about
> >> effects of nuclear testing, though unrelated to radioactivity issues;
> >> didn't
> >> stop it from being a good movie.
> >>
> > Probably my all-time favorite of the genre; an implausible concept made
> > plausible by a great, serious script. On a par with the original "The
> > Thing."
>
> Omg, I watched 'The Thing' at the flicks - yeah, it did what it was
> supposed to do - frighten the life out of me!
Are you guys talking about the 50's "The Thing from Another World", or the 80's
"The Thing"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|